<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									New Cedar: Armstrong Clark, Then TWP?? - Deck Stain Questions and Answers				            </title>
            <link>https://forum.deckstainhelp.com/deck-stain-questions-and-answers/new-cedar-armstrong-clark-then-twp/</link>
            <description>Deck Stain Help Forum Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:13:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>New Cedar: Armstrong Clark, Then TWP??</title>
                        <link>https://forum.deckstainhelp.com/deck-stain-questions-and-answers/new-cedar-armstrong-clark-then-twp/#post-10859</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[You can switch to TWP by using a deck stain stripper for the prep. The AC is easily removed if you want to switch.
	
	I would not worry about buying for the future. Nothing major will chan...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[You can switch to TWP by using a deck stain stripper for the prep. The AC is easily removed if you want to switch.<br />
	<br />
	I would not worry about buying for the future. Nothing major will change in the next few years.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://forum.deckstainhelp.com/deck-stain-questions-and-answers/">Deck Stain Questions and Answers</category>                        <dc:creator>Scott Paul ~ Restoring Wood &amp; Decks Since 1993</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.deckstainhelp.com/deck-stain-questions-and-answers/new-cedar-armstrong-clark-then-twp/#post-10859</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>New Cedar: Armstrong Clark, Then TWP??</title>
                        <link>https://forum.deckstainhelp.com/deck-stain-questions-and-answers/new-cedar-armstrong-clark-then-twp/#post-10853</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[1. Chicago, IL
	2. Full Sun on most, shady on part
	3. Cedar
	
	We have a new cedar deck that has aged 4 months. All but one of the horizontal boards is absorbing rain now (and some are ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[1. Chicago, IL<br />
	2. Full Sun on most, shady on part<br />
	3. Cedar<br />
	<br />
	We have a new cedar deck that has aged 4 months. All but one of the horizontal boards is absorbing rain now (and some are starting to split/crack).<br />
	<br />
	I see you like Armstrong Clark for new decks (paraffin), but tend to like TWP for a lot of others. If we initially use Armstrong Clark, do we stick with that for the 2nd coat later and a couple years out? Or do/can we switch to TWP.<br />
	<br />
	Just didn't know if it's best to stick with one product after you apply it. Also, does stain keep well? Seeing how the formulas keep changing, does it make sense to buy the recoat supply now?<br />
	<br />
	Thanks!]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://forum.deckstainhelp.com/deck-stain-questions-and-answers/">Deck Stain Questions and Answers</category>                        <dc:creator>finannm</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.deckstainhelp.com/deck-stain-questions-and-answers/new-cedar-armstrong-clark-then-twp/#post-10853</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		